<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>In Retentis &#187; Civil Procedure-1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inretentis.com/category/law-school/civil-procedure-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inretentis.com</link>
	<description>Among Things Held Back</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure: Venue</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=1280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governed by §1391, venue concerns the appropriate district court in which an action may be filed. Venue statutes are generally concerned with convenience, as they seek to channel lawsuits to an appropriately convenient court, given the matters raised and the parties involved in an action


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-forum-non-coveniens' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Forum Non Coveniens'>Civil Procedure: Forum Non Coveniens</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction'>Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test'>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=1277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personal Jurisdiction refers to the courts power to enter judgement against a defendant. Without personal jurisdiction, the court cannot bind the defendant to an obligation or adjudicate any rights over property. Personal Jurisdiction can be exercised when a defendant has met both statutory and constitutional requirements. Personal Jurisdiction can be either Specific or General, and determining which is applied depends on the types of contacts a defendant has with the state.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Venue'>Civil Procedure: Venue</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test'>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-forum-non-coveniens' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Forum Non Coveniens'>Civil Procedure: Forum Non Coveniens</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=1228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Grable Test carves out a "special and small category" of cases from state court jurisdiction arising from state-law claims. The Grable Test serves to determine whether federal question jurisdiction exists when there is a federal issue claimed to be embedded within a state law claim. Grable &#038; Sons Metal Prods. v. Darue Eng'g &#038; Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005).


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/subject-matter-jurisdiction-%c2%a71331-federal-question' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: §1331 &#8211; Federal Question'>Subject Matter Jurisdiction: §1331 &#8211; Federal Question</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Venue'>Civil Procedure: Venue</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction'>Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subject Matter Jurisdiction: §1331 &#8211; Federal Question</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/subject-matter-jurisdiction-%c2%a71331-federal-question</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/subject-matter-jurisdiction-%c2%a71331-federal-question#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to get into Federal Court under §1331, a plaintiff must demonstrate that a the case arises from a right or interest that is substantially founded on federal law. Further, the federal question must be affirmatively stated in the complaint, which is known as the well-pleaded complaint rule.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/getting-into-federal-court-a-civil-procedures-midterm' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Outline'>Civil Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Outline</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test'>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Venue'>Civil Procedure: Venue</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/subject-matter-jurisdiction-%c2%a71331-federal-question/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure: Erie Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-erie-doctrine</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-erie-doctrine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erie established that in federal diversity cases, matters characterized as substantive would be governed by state law, and those characterized as procedural would be governed by federal law. This became known as the “substance versus procedure” test.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test'>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/getting-into-federal-court-a-civil-procedures-midterm' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Outline'>Civil Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Outline</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction'>Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-erie-doctrine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure: Forum Non Coveniens</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-forum-non-coveniens</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-forum-non-coveniens#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latin for, "inappropriate forum," forum non conveniens (FNC) is a common law doctrine that gives courts the discretionary power to decline hearing a case if there is both an undue hardship on the defendant and a more convenient forum the case to be heard in.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-venue' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Venue'>Civil Procedure: Venue</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction'>Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test'>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-forum-non-coveniens/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Procedure: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Outline</title>
		<link>http://inretentis.com/law-school/getting-into-federal-court-a-civil-procedures-midterm</link>
		<comments>http://inretentis.com/law-school/getting-into-federal-court-a-civil-procedures-midterm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inretentis.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analyzing Cases Dealing With Federal Jurisdiction How are the parties trying to get into Federal Court? §1331 Federal Question? i.     Holmes ii.     Grable iii.     Well-Pleaded Complaint Artful Pleading §1332 Diversity &#38; Amount in Controversy? i.     Citizenship Issues Complete diversity under rule? ii.     Amount in controversy &#62;$75,000? Aggregated claims? Joined parties? Under what rule? §1367 Supplemental [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/subject-matter-jurisdiction-%c2%a71331-federal-question' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Subject Matter Jurisdiction: §1331 &#8211; Federal Question'>Subject Matter Jurisdiction: §1331 &#8211; Federal Question</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-grable-substantial-federal-issue-test' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test'>Civil Procedure: Grable Substantial Federal Issue Test</a></li><li><a href='http://inretentis.com/law-school/civil-procedure-personal-jurisdiction' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction'>Civil Procedure: Personal Jurisdiction</a></li></ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://inretentis.com/law-school/getting-into-federal-court-a-civil-procedures-midterm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

